**Quant Org Internal Memo** – received July 5 by Def-Vet from E.M

Author Code Name: **Woet**. True Identity unknown at this time. Considered high security risk for the national financial sector.

**“Write Him Off” – Zine Equals A Zero**

The new updated report on the probability calibration of trouble shooting the Zine algorithm carried a lot of problems with the probability density function that surfaced as an unknown and difficult to understand .

I surmised this because of the notation bugs resulting from the raw data qubits in correlation to the combinations and permutations of binary data mining inputs which upon the advent of a forced upgrade gave only the instructions for “x” that I found written on the wall in the office kitchen by the firm’s trustee who is often slow to be glad about my current position as data analyst, because he is a die-hard traditional mind-set of frameworking the tiling isohedras gathered from the TOS platform.

The less the limbs on the decision tree, I claimed that everything comes in threes pertaining to the measures of the percentiles and quartiles, ref: Ian Steen. He claims the recent score for in-house or not is his only standard data into one hot flipflop of the swithces that equates Clarks – 40 S Saint Theorem based on Laurent linear polynomial format.

A recent thesis by Rees, et al shows that they denied this by at least one P separation, ref. Seth E ETC; when you start at 90, he said that Warren’s data is the first percentile of the city’s demographic while I doubt his algorithm session performed without a flaw from the “glide” which is suppose to present no doubts that the Notation is an alternate code alone at best to intuit the percentile construct built into the adaptive agent learning memory.

It was expressed at the board meeting that with the firms aggregate years of experience, that should enhance the unit of intelligence to a 10/80 power, our ability to supersede humanity’s own ability to absorb experiences at 650 milliseconds – deviated by 3 milliseconds per neural synapse, should be 15% greater than the citizen consumer based on a control group of 91 witnesses to the machine-to-machine prototype.

This extends Tesselers equal or better than 75% social class needs to notice that we’d been already prepared infinitely per person to collect substantial profits from what was clearly 45% of the “witnesses” bias performance valuation versus the “child-parent union” factor.

Consumer response to the product launch was 20% higher than expectations while in the second quartile analysis, the thought processing averaged per millisecond or glide was 20% higher confirming that going forward will be just routine for the third programming quartile session. The citizen’s techno-device quest was identified by 4% use of the quarter range of our own data set; based on global consumption and natural resource availability.

Cheating bias was in need for the entire data set to be firmly set with empirical evidence in the first quartile correlated to the standard score median that was already shooting beyond the third quartile score.

This indeed helped me to own what was Kingsley’s proof of concept prior to my own thesis release, showing that the man lives on an island when it comes to incorporating the irrational user behavior numbers between what is displayed here as step one, and arranged accordingly through the sequencing.

We’re in small ways moving towards the largest break through in quibit coding, but facing less outside funding which means that our entire data set goal may or may not have an even chance of meeting the valuation deadline.

The only means of accomplishment at this time is to find a deep pockets cell among the 19 Seventies Equity Funds that she and myself are tuning into for an equal split on top of the 35 plus 45 ratio, designated by the late 19 – 40 baseline point system that is worth taking into consideration given our game changing breakthrough with fungi circuitry for the motherboard if we are given patent approval, re: 1223 in the 35 segmentations of required purposes.

To be sure we remain ahead of our competition, I added the all-odd numbers scores squared by integers that result in the “bringing in the money” outcome. No valued headlines in the media regarding a possible competitor or infiltrator to our project.

This is a relief since Switches and Witches reported that the median of old values are heating up certain sectors, three in fact reporting a code sequenced output of 35566778 to the power of 79 – known as the male bonding citizen element in human DNA. The TOS quartiles define this appropriately as the termed “injured portal ranges” that I discovered last Saturday after receiving a **text from outlier user E. Martinez (code name DG 3-2). He reported that one 67-12 equaled 51 points **in the set of data which minus “King One” closes the critical logic gate that must produce many standard deviations by perceptive observation that is fundamentally a responsibility of in our Eastern research court.

They calculated the following formation based on the **quad-triangle analysis of the Zuni temple**. Digging through my archival notes of hundreds of failed arguments in the algorithm Zine, all produced by “halt” calculations showed that Team Score X didn’t do the observations that I had instructed them to do, which made me have to present my ITM in front of the firm’s CEO.

But in terms of the interchangeability of less content, as I explained, for the standard score, I actually provided the proof of concept result without the Asian sector’s trouble shooting support saving our firm millions of dollars. Regardless, the mean score came out at 85, equivalent of the test score from the formula I created known as “Three Easy Zero”.

In this formula “E” equals zero, that makes the program quirky enough which was inspired by my niece Courtney’s own quirky behavior in decision making; who is a complete deviation of zeros from sigma.

Anyway I resolved the upper echelon’s Zoo Courts dilemma by declaring that their inputs into the formula were “walls” and to get around this was to calibrate the sub-syntax code to five minus the new standard deviation embedded in Zine – line 3298756-123-a234.

That reduces the outcome to exactly where we wanted the prototype to be expressed for confirmation of being bug free – proved by the seeing on the computer monitor: “Write Him Off; Z Equals Zero”